Petition under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an interim order of the Arbitral Tribunal was withdrawn with leave of the Court and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
M/S DESIGN N DESIGN AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Panwar, Mr. Tanishq Panwar, Ms. Arushi Panwar, Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Sahej Sawhney, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. APRIL 02, 2026/rk/dj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:33:26
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chandanwari CGHS Limited
M/s Design N Design
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
