Disposed¶14

Union of India v. M/S Varindera Constructions Ltd.

Delhi HC1 Apr 2026O.M.P. (COMM)/73/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

O.M.P. (COMM) 73/2024; Union of India v. M/s Varindera Constructions Ltd; High Court of Delhi; Joint Registrar (Judicial) Bhawani Sharma; order dated 17.04.2026; release of amount subject to corporate guarantee; time granted to file proper valid corporate guarantee; verification of corporate guarantee by Registry; authorised person to appear in person or via video conferencing; office note listing; prior order dated 01.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Time granted to the respondent to file a proper valid corporate guarantee; Registry directed to place the matter before the Court for verification of the guarantee upon its filing; respondent to ensure presence of an authorised person (in person or by video conferencing). ¶14

Union of India Vs M/S Varindera Constructions Ltd. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondent should be granted time to file a proper valid corporate guarantee in place of the corporate guarantee filed along with its application.

¶13

Court's answer

The Court granted the respondent time to file a proper valid corporate guarantee.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

The Registry was directed to place the matter before the Court for verification of the corporate guarantee as and when a valid proper corporate guarantee is filed by the respondent.

¶14

Key takeaways

The respondent was directed to ensure the presence of an authorised person on behalf of the company, who may join the proceedings through video conferencing or by appearing in person in the Court.ratio¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Joint Registrar (Judicial), Bhawani Sharma), O.M.P. (COMM) 73/2024, Union of India v. M/s Varindera Constructions Ltd., order dated 17.04.2026: The file was placed before the Court on office note pursuant to the order dated 01.04.2026 providing for release of the amount to the respondent subject to furnishing a corporate guarantee. Counsel for the respondent stated that the corporate guarantee filed along with the application was valid up to pendency of the proceedings and sought time to file a proper valid corporate guarantee. The Court granted time, directed the Registry to place the matter before the Court for verification of the guarantee as and when a valid proper corporate guarantee was filed, and directed the respondent to ensure the presence of an authorised person on behalf of the company, who may join the proceedings through video conferencing or in person. Short procedural order; no statutory provisions or precedents discussed and no monetary amount quantified.

Union of India v. M/S Varindera Constructions Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India v. M/S Varindera Constructions Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Lease Plan India Private Limited Vs P. D. Memorial Religious and Educational Association

Altf Spaces Private Limited Vs Ms Dhindora Club

Hanon Automative Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ptc India Limited

M/S Splendor Landbase Limited Vs M/S Ntt Data Global Delivery Services Private Limited

Sujit Kumar Jaiswal Vs the Managing Director Dalmia Research International Pvt. Ltd.

SP Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Jharkhand & Anr.