Sonu v. Delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Street vendors whose vending license applications were rejected for lacking three pre-survey challans challenged the Town Vending Committee's policy. The court upheld the scrutiny and the three-challan criteria as a valid policy decision, but directed that vendors with fewer challans be considered if excess capacity arises after the next survey.
What did the court decide?
Petitions disposed of; rejections upheld; vendors with fewer than three challans may be considered if excess capacity exists after TVC finalises the vending plan.