Ambrish Kumar Patel v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A batch of 110 writ petitions by serving CISF personnel sought an additional 5% HRA. Relying on the Division Bench decision in Jaspal Singh Mann and the Supreme Court's affirmation in Union of India v. Paramisivan M., the Court held the respondents could not re-agitate the objection and allowed the petitions.
What did the court decide?
Writ petitions allowed in terms of Jaspal Singh Mann; respondents directed to release payable HRA amounts within 03 months.