Disposed¶31

Govind Prasad Gupta v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Delhi HC22 May 2026W.P.(C)/6437/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sarojini Nagar Market vendor; Certificate of Vending (CoV); New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC); Town Vending Committee (TVC) final decision; Article 226 writ; maintainability after TVC decision; interim protection limited till survey and vending plan; Shop No.165 vending spot; forged documents and false affidavits; proceedings before Magistrate; survey participation; claim not recommended; petition disposed of; CM APPL. 31704/2026, 35224/2026, 35583/2026 disposed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the TVC's final decision rejecting the Petitioner's vending claim, the present petition is not maintainable. ¶30

Govind Prasad Gupta Vs New Delhi Municipal Council… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 6437/2026

¶4

GOVIND PRASAD GUPTA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Appearance not given.

¶6

versus

¶7

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetanya Singh, Ms. Ria Sachthey & Ms. Swati, Advs. for NDMC. Mr. Pranav Proothi & Mr Anshveer Singh Nalwa, Advs. for applicant in CM APPL.35224/2026.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 22.05.2026

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

CM APPL. 31704/2026

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

The application stands disposed of.

¶16

W.P.(C) 6437/2026 & CM APPL. 35224/2026, CM APPL. 35583/2026

¶17

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-Govind Prasad Gupta, who claims to be a vendor in the Sarojini Nagar Market, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia , seeking grant of a Certificate of Vending (hereinafter, ‘CoV’ ) as also an opportunity of being heard.

¶18

The Petitioner had earlier submitted some documents to the New Delhi Municipal Council (hereinafter, ‘NDMC’ ) for the CoV which were found to be forged and certain proceedings in respect of the same are pending before

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/05/2026 at 12:54:32

¶21

the Magistrate concerned.

¶22

The Petitioner had also filed another writ petition being W.P.(C) 7915/2024 titled ‘Govind Prasad Gupta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.’ in which interim protection was granted to the Petitioner in the following terms:

¶23

“6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of by directing that the petitioner not be interdicted from carrying on his vending activities in opposite Shop No.165, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi (open to sky, admeasuring 6ft. x 4ft.), subject to the petitioner carrying on vending activities in accordance with law.

¶24

7. We clarify that this arrangement would continue only till the survey is conducted and a vending plan is prepared.”

¶25

As can be seen from the above order, the arrangement which was directed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was to continue only till the survey was conducted by the NDMC and the vending plan was prepared.

¶26

After passing of the order dated 28th May, 2024 in W.P.(C) 7915/2024 , the Petitioner has participated in the survey and the Town Vending Committee (hereinafter, ‘TVC’ ) has now taken a final decision in respect of the Petitioner which is extracted below:

¶27

“In view of the multiple complaints received from the Sarojini Nagar Market Shopkeepers Association alleging submission of manipulated and false documents, false affidavits, concealment of material facts, and abuse of the judicial process, the case does not merit favourable consideration. Further, NDMC has categorically disclosed before the Hon’ble Court that the reported vendor has not been squatting since 2015. This position is corroborated by various NDMC survey reports, wherein the individual was not found vending in front of Shop No.165. In light of the above facts and records, the claim lacks credibility and is not recommended. ”

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/05/2026 at 12:54:32

¶30

In view of the final decision of the TVC, the present petition would not be maintainable.

¶31

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

¶32

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶33

MADHU JAIN, J.

¶34

MAY 22, 2026 ab/ck

¶35

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/05/2026 at 12:54:32

Govind Prasad Gupta v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Prasad Gupta v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Islamuddin Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary & Ors.

Ashwani Kumar Pandey Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ashrit Talwar Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Smt Sheela Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Bhuthalingam Hariharan Vs Bureau of Immigration

Molvi Anzar Vs National Testing Agency & Ors.

Ms. Aarti Mathur & Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Smt. Shiksha Jain Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vicky Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Salim Malik Munna Vs State through SHO Ps Special Cell

Sanjeev Kumar Kansal Vs the Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

M/S MICRO9 Minechem Industries Vs M/S Sanjay Traders

Anita Devi Vs Delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Kanta Rani Vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.