Petitioner sought to withdraw her writ petition against Delhi Public School and others, stating the grievance had already been addressed by the respondents; the High Court dismissed the petition along with pending applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
MRS. FARHAT BANO .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Iffat Fatima, Advocate. Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha & Mr. Sachin Bhatt, Advocates.
versus
DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sakshi Mendiratta, Advocate for R1 AND R2 Ms. Manisha Singh, ASC for CBSE.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 20.05.2026
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. MAY 20, 2026/ R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2026 at 12:15:45
Mrs. Farhat Bano
Delhi Public School
CBSE
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
