Writ petition sought stay of demolition and eviction order and restraint against alleged selective action by DDA. Counsel submitted there were no substantive prayers for the relief sought and sought permission to withdraw. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
SMT. SHEELA .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTTY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rashi Aggarwal, Proxy for Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
CM APPL. 34202/2026
W.P.(C) 6947/2026, CM APPL. 34201/2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2026 at 12:15:39
Petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. 7. In view of submissions made, present Writ Petition along with pending Applications stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
MAY 20, 2026/ R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2026 at 12:15:39
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. SHEELA
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTTY
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
