Dismissed¶¶19

Ranu Jangra v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd.

Delhi HC9 Jul 2026W.P.(C)/6851/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition; Section 343 DMC Act demolition order dated 06.04.2026; show cause notice dated 16.03.2026; MCD status report; BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. inspection 30.03.2026 no electricity connection found; subject property; Delhi High Court; Justice Amit Bansal; W.P.(C) 6851/2024; W.P.(C) 7788/2024. Procedural disposal only — no merits decided, no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a fresh petition in respect of the petitioners' grievances with regard to the subject property; direction to supply the show cause notice dated 16 March 2026 and the demolition order dated 6 April 2026 to petitioner's counsel within three days. ¶¶19

Ranu Jangra Vs B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~15 & 16

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

15.

¶4

W.P.(C) 6851/2024 & CM APPL. 28538/2024 RENU JANGRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Navin Kumar, Ms. Surbhi Agarwal and Ms. Rashmeet Kaur, Advocates. versus B.S.E.S. YAMUNA POWER LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Ms. Riddhi Jain, Advocates. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Ms. Madhu Yadav, Ms. Sneha Roy, Ms. Gurleen Kaur Sran and Mr. S. Gupta, Advocates for MCD.

¶5

16.

¶6

+ W.P.(C) 7788/2024 & CM APPL. 32282/2024

¶7

PUSHPA RANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Navin Kumar, Ms. Surbhi Agarwal and Ms. Rashmeet Kaur, Advocates.

¶8

versus

¶9

B.S.E.S. YAMUNA POWER LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Ms. Riddhi Jain, Advocates. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Ms. Madhu Yadav, Ms. Sneha Roy, Ms. Gurleen Kaur Sran and Mr. S. Gupta, Advocates for MCD.

¶10

W.P.(C) 6851/2024 & connected matter

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:37:54

¶14

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶15

O R D E R % 09.07.2026

¶16

Pursuant to the order passed on 19^th March, 2026, a status report has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.2/MCD, wherein inter alia it is stated that after following due process of law, a demolition order under Section 343 of the DMC Act has been passed on 6^th April, 2026.

¶17

A status report has also been filed on behalf of respondent no.1/BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., wherein it is stated that the subject property was inspected on 30^th March, 2026 and no electricity connection was found at the subject property.

¶18

In light of the averments made in the status reports filed by the respondents, Mr. Navin Kumar, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in respect of their grievances with regard to the subject property.

¶19

Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶20

The show cause notice dated 16^th March, 2026 as well as the demolition order dated 6^th April, 2026 referred to in paragraph 12 of the status report filed by MCD, shall be supplied to the counsel for the petitioner within three (3) days from today.

AMIT BANSAL, J

JULY 9, 2026

Vivek/-

W.P.(C) 6851/2024 & connected matter

¶25

Page 2 of 2

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2026 at 11:37:54

Ranu Jangra v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranu Jangra v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navdeep Singh Murbay Vs Union of India and Ors.

Puneet and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S Planet Dewsoft Private Limited Vs Union of India and Anr.

Agrasen Parents Association Vs Directorate of Education and Anr.

Sunita Vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

MD Shahzad Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

M/S Heighstar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Gauri Shankar and Anr. Vs New-Delhi Muncipal Council and Ors.

South Delhi University Teachers Coop Group Housing Society Ltd. through Its General Secretary Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Ms Rimjhim Gupta & Ors. Vs the Chief Secretariat Delhi & Ors.

Avantika Vyapar Mandal (Regd.) Vs Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors.

Sudhir Rana Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Brij Mohan Tyagi Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Satbir Singh (Dead) Thr Lrs Vs Sushila @ Sheela Devi & Ors.