Petitioner sought pension on higher wages with arrears. Counsel stated the respondents have released the requisite pension and arrears, so the petition was not pressed and was disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
Through: Mr. Vibhor Verdhan and Ms. Mura, Advs. (through v/c)
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH OF SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC and Mr. Dipanshu Sharma, Adv. for R-1 (through v/c) Mr. Siddharth, SC, Ms. Himanshi Girdhar and Mr. Deepanshu Grover, Advs. for R-2 and 3.
Mr. Rambir Singh and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. (through v/c)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 20.05.2026
SACHIN DATTA, J
MAY 20, 2026/ cl
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 13:12:55
Rambir Singh
Union of India through Secretary of Ministry of Labour and Employment
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
