Vikash Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.(C) 3027/2026; CM APPL. 14572/2026; CM APPL. 14573/2026; High Court of Delhi at New Delhi; Vikash Kumar Singh (petitioner, with advocates V.S. Dubey, Sushil Kumar, Mandeep Kumar, Ashish Pandey, and Petitioner-in-Person) versus Union of India (Respondent No. 1; Ms. Pratima N. Lakra CGSC, Mr. Rahul Bhaskar G.P., Ms. Upanita Souryadarshini) and CBSE / Central Board of Secondary Education (Respondent No. 2; Mr. M.A. Niyazi Standing Counsel, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Mr. Nehmat Seth); coram Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia; order dated 11.03.2026 (MARCH 11, 2026); writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; averments and prayer clause vague, non-specific, omnibus; liberty to seek administrative redressal by representation with specific and pointed averments; digitally signed order downloaded from DHC Server 16/03/2026.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to seek redressal of his grievances administratively by making a representation containing specific and pointed averments.