Writ petition concerning a blacklisting order. Counsel for respondents stated on instructions that the blacklisting runs only up to 07.07.2027, mitigating the petition's prayer. The court disposed of the petition, leaving the petitioner free to challenge the blacklisting order separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~99
MS. ANITA ESMAEILZADEH
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi with Mr. Ranjeet Saw, Adva.
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Ramam CGSC with Mr. Arnav Mittal, GP for R-1 to 5.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MARCH 10, 2026/P
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:49:45
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survives given the respondent's statement that the petitioner stands blacklisted only until 07.07.2027?
Ms. Anita Esmaeilzadeh
Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
