Petitioner challenged the dismissal of a public premise appeal. The Court acknowledged an undertaking by the petitioner to vacate and disposed of the petition without interference, directing no coercive action pending compliance.
Writ petition treated as not pressed; petitioner given time to vacate without coercive steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
RAVI SHANKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Dewan, Ms. Muskan Dewan and Mr. Ayush Dewan, Advocates (through vc).
versus
Through: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Shagun Sabharwal, Ms. Laqshyaa Saluja and Ms. Anamika Tyagi, Advocates for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 09.04.2026
“a) Allow writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, by issuing writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ inter-alia quashing and set aside the impugned order dated 31.01.2026 passed by the Ld. Court of District & Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Court in P.P. Act appeal no. 20/2018.
Any other or further order/(s) which this Hon’ble Court may kindly deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances as well as the interest of justice in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent/s.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 12:04:31
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 12:04:31
pressed. The petitioner shall abide by the undertaking given by him and shall vacate the subject premises on or before 09.09.2026. Till then, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner. In case, the petitioner does not abide by the said undertaking, the respondents shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
AMIT SHARMA, J
APRIL 09, 2026 /bsr/ah
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 12:04:31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court ought to have allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the public premise appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi Shankar
Delhi Development Authority
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
