Dismissed¶19

Techniko Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. v. 1. National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Apr 2026W.P.(C)/3213/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, 08.04.2026, W.P.(C) 3213/2026 and CM APPL. 15402/2026, Techniko Consultancy Pvt Ltd v NHIDCL and Yongma Engineering Co. Ltd.; bench Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan, JJ.; writ petition dismissed without entertainment; joint venture consultancy award via NHIDCL tender; petitioner's 40% payment share unpaid with TDS deducted; removal from project WhatsApp group (2022); inter-se dispute referable to arbitration under the agreement.

What did the court decide?

After hearing learned counsel, the real dispute appears to be between the Petitioner and Respondent No.2, and as per the agreement between the parties that dispute is referable to Arbitration. ¶18

Techniko Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Vs 1. National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3213/2026 and CM APPL. 15402/2026 TECHNIKO CONSULTANCY PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rudra Vikram Singh, Mr. Ashirvad Kumar Yadav, Ms. Neetu Rani and Ms. Rashmi, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.

¶6

.....Respondents

¶7

Through: Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. for R-2.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶10

O R D E R % 08.04.2026

¶11

By way of the present Petition, the Petitioner prays for issuance of direction to reinstate it in the project and release its payment, representing 40% share.

¶12

The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 (M/s Yongma Engineering Co. Ltd.) entered into an agreement and appear to have jointly applied for award of consultancy work, pursuant to a tender issued by the National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited. The work was awarded in favour of the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2.

¶13

The Petitioner claims that it was removed from the WhatsApp group of the project in the year 2022. In substance, the Petitioner

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:54:33

¶16

submits that he is not being paid payment equivalent to 40% share by the Respondent No.1, though TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) is being deducted and he is not being allowed to participate in the project.

¶17

As per the agreement between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2, the dispute between the parties is to be resolved through Arbitration.

¶18

After having heard learned counsel representing the parties, the real dispute appears to be between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2. The dispute as per the agreement between the parties, is referable to Arbitration.

¶19

Hence, this Court does not find it appropriate to entertain the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed.

¶20

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶21

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

¶22

APRIL 08, 2026 s.godara/ad

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:54:33

Techniko Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. v. 1. National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Techniko Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. v. 1. National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baby Tanvi Yadav through Her Guardian Sushil Yadav (Father) Vs Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Nb Sub Ramakant Singh Vs Union of India

Carreg Commodities Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.

Godrej Agrovet Ltd. Vs Food Safety and Standards Authority of India & Anr.

Master Tanishq Negi through Her Mother Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ms. Kanta Bhatia Vs Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology and Ors.

Ms Nex Avenue Estates Private Limited Vs the Govt. NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Tek Chand @ Teka (Now Deceased) through His Legal Heirs Vikram Vs Government of NCT of Delhi through Its Secretary Land and Building Department & Ors.

Manish Kumar Gupta Vs Director General Coast Guard and Ors.

Smt Poonam Kishan Vs Union of India Ministry of Defense & Anr.

Rajeev Kumar Chauhan Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Goyala Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shashikant Saini Vs Union of India & Ors.

Girish Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors.