Raghubir Singh v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 2766/2026; DDA; Delhi Development Authority; Estate Officer-II D; P.P. Act appeal; PPA No. 17/2018; Tis Hazari Courts; Principal District & Sessions Judge; unauthorised occupant; eviction; damages; public premises Karol Bagh; undertaking to vacate; affidavit of undertaking; no coercive steps; disposed as not pressed; vacate by 27.08.2026; Articles 226 & 227; Amit Sharma J. Relevant for matters where DDA eviction/damages disputes end by petitioner's undertaking to vacate with time-bound protection from coercive action rather than adjudication of merits.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as not pressed; petitioner permitted to retain possession of the subject premises until 27.08.2026 with no coercive steps against him till then, subject to abiding by his undertaking to vacate on or before 27.08.2026; respondents at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law if the undertaking is breached.