Writ petition against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi was withdrawn by counsel seeking liberty to refile with better particulars; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~97
NAZIR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meena Chaudhary and Mr. Akkash Bhadana, Advocates.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chirag Madan, ASC for MCD with Mr. Sai Krishna Kumar, Mr. Ronit Bose, Ms. Rachael Tuli and Mr. Randeep Sabharwal, Advocates for MCD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 12.02.2026
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026 Rzu
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 13:00:24
Nazir
Municipal Corporation of Delhi through its Commissioner
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (second respondent)
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
