Writ petition against Delhi Development Authority dismissed for non-prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared despite prior notice of non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
.....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Kawrani, Mr. Marshal Girdhar, Mr. Viraj Khemani,Mr. Aashutosh Deol Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 13.02.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2026 (MS)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:45:04
Santosh Kohli
Delhi Development Authority
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
