Dismissed¶¶15
Renu Nanda v. UOI & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1757/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Renu Nanda v. UOI & Anr, W.P.(C) 1757/2007 (High Court of Delhi, order dated 14.01.2026, Dinesh Mehta & Vinod Kumar, JJ.) — writ petition challenging search/seizure proceedings under section 132 of the Income Tax Act and seeking operation of bank accounts/FDRs/lockers and return of seized articles; dismissed as infructuous since no interim order had been passed and 18 years had elapsed since the search; liberty to apply for revival.
What did the court decide?
In the absence of any interim order, the impugned proceedings would naturally have come to a logical end, and 18 years after the search no relief can be granted to the petitioner. ¶¶14