Writ petition challenging Coast Guard retirement age of 57 years under Rule 20(1); petitioner sought withdrawal to make a representation seeking relief in terms of an earlier Delhi High Court judgment; permission granted and petition withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Through: Mr. Saurabh Suman Sinha & Mr. Gautam Prabhakar, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Manoj Kumar Tyagi Sr.P.C., Ms Prachi Verma & Mr. Shekhar Tyagi, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 13.01.2026
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 13, 2026/ “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:31:55
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India & OrsRelied on¶2
2025 : DHC: 10356-DB
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vikas Saksena
Union of India & Ors.
Anil Kshetarpal
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
