Disposed¶25

Late Chhabuati Dahake College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Feb 2026W.P.(C)/1568/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 1568/2026; decided 04.02.2026; Jasmeet Singh, J.; petitioner: Late Chhabuati Dahake College of Education (Gaurav Arora); respondents: National Council for Teacher Education & Anr. (Anuj Kapoor, Nandeesh Nanda, Shivom Sethi); Article 226; writ of certiorari; pending application dt. 20.01.2014; shifting/change of premises; inspection already conducted; time-bound disposal within 6 weeks; petition disposed; liberty to challenge outcome preserved.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to hear the petitioner and dispose of the representation (pending application dt. 20.01.2014 for shifting of premises) expeditiously, not later than 6 weeks; petitioner free to challenge the outcome in accordance with law. ¶25

Late Chhabuati Dahake College of Education Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~66

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1568/2026

¶4

LATE CHHABUATI DAHAKE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora, Adv.

¶7

versus

¶8

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs. for R-1&2

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 04.02.2026 CM APPL. 7626/2026

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The application is disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 1568/2026

¶15

This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer:

¶16

“a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and direct the respondent no.2 to consider & decide the pending application dt. 20.01.2014, submitted by the petitioner for shifting of its premises, in accordance with law expeditiously in a time bound manner; and/or...”

¶17

Mr. Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:04:42

¶20

application for change of premise of the petitioner has not been decided for a considerable period of time by the respondent No. 2. He also states that the inspection concerning the required change has already taken place.

¶21

For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶22

Mr. Nanda, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶23

Without admitting the averments made by the petitioner and subject to verification of the records, Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, states that if the application has not been decided so far, the same will be done expeditiously.

¶24

In view of the above, it is directed that the respondents shall hear the petitioner and dispose of the representation expeditiously and not later than 6 weeks from today.

¶25

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶26

In case the petitioner is aggrieved, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the outcome in accordance with the law.

¶27

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶28

FEBRUARY 4, 2026/DM

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:04:42

Late Chhabuati Dahake College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Late Chhabuati Dahake College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piraivanmathi P Vs Directorate of Education and Ors.

M/S Iifl Home Finance Ltd. Vs Sagar Aggarwal & Ors.

Dr Gitanjali Dey Vs Punjab National Bank through Branch Manager Vikas Puri

Amit Jain Vs General Manager Canara Bank & Ors.

Dr Bipin Batra Vs National Board of Examinations and Another

Resident Welfare Association Pocket- K and Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Santhi Caterers Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kartik Rana Vs Airport Authority of India

Dr Gitanjali Dey Vs Punjab National Bank through Branch Manager Vikas Puri

Raj Kumari Vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

Dr. Subhash Giri Vs Delhi Development Authority

Pankaj Kumar Vs Special Task Force and Others

Ram Lal Arya Vs DDA

Gunjan Wadhwa & Anr. Vs Lok Nayak Hospital & Ors.