Resident Welfare Association Pocket- K and v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Applications filed by respondent no.3 stating it decided not to operate its mobile tower at the disputed sites, and that the tower had been dismantled and removed. The court allowed the applications and disposed of the three writ petitions as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Applications allowed; writ petitions disposed of as infructuous after respondent no.3 dismantled the tower.