to the judgment dated 25.08.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA Nos. 382/2026, 391/2026 and 452/2026 . The said appeals arose out of the order dated 11.05.2026 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) Nos. 2943/2026 and 17239/2025, and concerned an issue substantially similar to the one raised in the present petition. It is submitted that the appellants before the Division Bench were similarly placed as the present petitioners and had challenged the eviction notices issued in respect of the very same Jhuggi Jhopri and Basti settlements. The respondents therein, i.e., the L&DO, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, and DUSIB, had submitted that a rehabilitation scheme had been framed for the affected dwellers and that they were proposed to be relocated to flats constructed at Savda Ghevra, situated in the north-western part of Delhi. The eviction notice under challenge before the Division Bench was also dated 29.09.2025, followed by subsequent eviction-cum-demolition notices, as in the present case. After considering the rival submissions advanced on behalf of the appellants and the respondents, the Division Bench, vide its judgment dated 25.08.2026, held that the appellants had failed to establish any illegality or infirmity in the process adopted by the respondents for eviction of the dwellers of the concerned Jhuggi Jhopri and Basti settlements. The Division Bench also considered the contention regarding violation of the Rehabilitation Policy, 2015, which has been raised before this Court as well, and found the same to be untenable. The Division Bench, inter alia, held as follows:
