The petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition with liberty to file fresh original proceedings. The Court granted such leave and liberty and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to institute fresh original proceedings. Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
CNR No. DLHC010429562026
SONU AND ANR .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Puneet Rathi, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raktim Gogoi, CGSC along with Ms. Akshita Nigam, Mr. Kaushalendra Dutt Pandey and Mr. Ankit Parindiyal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
ORDER (ORAL)
% 10.09.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, Mr. Puneet Rathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to institute fresh original proceedings in accordance with law challenging the action of the respondents. Leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid.
2. This writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2026/ cd
Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Da te:1 6.09.2026 10:40:52
SONU AND ANR
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
C. HARI SHANKAR
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
