Disposed

Vijender Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC14 Aug 2026W.P.(C)/11696/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing a writ petition wherein the Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to take action in strict accordance with the law regarding unauthorized construction, while protecting the rights of the owner/occupier.

What did the court decide?

Directs respondent no.1/MCD to take action strictly in accordance with law; directs SHO PS Model Town to provide police force for necessary action.

Vijender Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CNR No. DLHC010376412026

¶4

- W.P.(C) 11696/2026 & CM APPL. 54173/2026

¶5

VIJENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam Sharma and Mr. Adeed Nawaz, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Parashar, Advocate for R- 1/MCD. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel and Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Adv. for Delhi Police, PS: Model Town.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 14.08.2026

¶11

CM APPL. 54173/2026 ( exemption )

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

W.P.(C) 11696/2026

¶14

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to demolish the unauthorised construction being carried out by the private respondent no.2 over and outside MCD Quarters No. 14 and 18, Mubarik Bagh, Behind Police Station Model Town, North West, Delhi –

¶15

W.P.(C) 11696/2026

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:42:14

¶19

110009 (‘subject property’).

¶20

Mr . Tushar Parashar, counsel appearing on advance notice on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD, submits that appropriate action in accordance with law shall be taken against the unauthorized construction in an expeditious manner.

¶21

Taking the aforesaid submissions on record, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent no.1/MCD to take action strictly in accordance with law. 5. The SHO, P.S. Model Town is directed to provide adequate police force so that necessary action can be taken by the respondent no.1/MCD. 6. This order shall be communicated to the SHO, P.S. Model Town by Mr. Niraj Kumar, who represents Delhi Police and is present in Court. 7. In the event the petitioner has any further grievance with regard to unauthorised construction, he is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶22

All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owner/occupier/respondent no.2 shall remain protected.

¶23

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶24

AUGUST 14, 2026 Vivek/-

¶25

W.P.(C) 11696/2026

¶26

Page 2 of 2

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:42:14

Vijender Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijender Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupesh Sehgal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Union of India and Anr. Vs Dr. Swetabh Suman

Mahindra Mstc Recycling Private Limited & Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mukesh Gupta Vs Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College & Ors.

Vidya Bharati School Vs Anil Kumar Ahuja & Anr.

Satish Chander Vs Land and Development Authority & Anr.

Pooja Burman Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Vidya Bharti School Vs Ms Ranju Sharma and Anr.