State Vs Raj Kumar Goel and Ors.

¶1

$~15

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- TR.P.(CRL.) 44/2025

¶4

STATE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State.

¶5

versus

¶6

RAJ KUMAR GOEL AND O	RS.	.....Respondents
Through:	Mr.	Wiqar Ahmed, Mr. Shubham
	Para Goe	shar, Advocates for Raj Kumar l.
	Mr.	Ashish Bhatt and Ms. Vipasha
	Sriv	astava, Advocates for Subhash
	Cha	nd Gupta.
	Mr. Sam	Rishabh Yadav, Advocate for bhav Jain.
	Mr. Kum	Ajun Malik, Advocate for Ashok ar.
	Mr.	Kartik Khanna, Advocate for
	Roh	it Tandon, Dinesh Bhola and
	Kam	al Jain.
	Mr.	L.N. Rao and Mr. Aryan Rajpal,
	Adv	ocates for Rajesh Jain.
	Mr.	Akkash Bhadana, Ms. Ayushi
	Shar Mr.	ma, Advocates for Dinesh and Ravinder.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

¶8

O R D E R % 02.07.2025

¶9

Judicial file bearing SC No. 408/2017, titled “State Vs. Raj Kumar Goel & Ors.” FIR No. 205/2016, P.S.Crime Branch South East has been

¶10

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/07/2025 at 09:41:39

¶11

received along with letter dated 27.05.2025 of learned ASJ (FTC)-01, South East, District Court No. 613, Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi, duly forwarded vide letter No. 35(F) Judl./TCR/Intimation/F.40/SE/ Saket / 2025 dated 28.05.2025, Office Incharge/Judicial Branch for Principal District & Sessions Judge (South-East), Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi.

¶12

Vide order dated 26.05.2025, learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi has passed the following order:-

¶13

“ ....

¶14

It is informed that accused Rajesh Jain is the Former MLA of Delhi Assembly.

¶15

As there is a designated Court to try the matters of MP/MLA at Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, it is appropriate that the present matter is tried by the said designated Court.

¶16

In these circumstances, the present matter be placed before the Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, New Delhi for appropriate directions.

¶17

Both the sides alongwith the respective counsels are directed to appear before the Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, New Delhi on 30.05.2025 at 10:00 AM. .... "

¶18

As per the decision of the Hon’ble Administrative & General Supervision Committee of this Court dated 15.04.2019, request received from the learned District & Sessions Judges for the transfer of the case from one District to another District, subordinate to the High Court, shall be placed by the Registry by way of transfer petition before the concerned Bench for appropriate consideration and orders. Accordingly, the file has been placed as a transfer petition before this Court.

¶19

Criminal Case bearing SC No. 408/2017, FIR No. 205/2016, PS Crime Branch South East, titled “State Vs. Raj Kumar Goel & Ors.”is stated to be pending before the court of learned Principal District & Sessions

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/07/2025 at 09:41:39

¶21

Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi and one of the accused, namely Rajesh Jain is former MLA of Delhi Assembly. Both Sides duly represented by learned Addl. PP and learned counsel for respondents fairly state that Special Courts have jurisdiction to try the cases pertaining to MPs/MLAs, which will include sitting MPs/MLAs as also former MPs/MLAs against whom criminal cases have been filed and therefore have no objection if case FIR No. 205/2016, P.S.Crime Branch South East, titled “State Vs. Raj Kumar Goel & Ors.”, presently pending before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, be transferred to the Special Court.

¶22

By virtue of the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the case of Ashwini Kumar Upadhayay Vs. Union of India & Anr., W.P. (C) 699/2016 , Special Courts were constituted with a view to deal with the cases filed against MPs/MLAs, sitting or former, in order to ensure that such cases pending against them are tried expeditiously. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Manjinder Singh Sirsa Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr., CRL M.C. 9128/2023 & CRL. M.A. 34100/2023 , while dealing with

¶23

an identical issue, observed as under:-

¶24

“23. In the aforesaid legal scenario, this Court is of the firm opinion that it cannot go beyond the mandate of the Hon'ble Apex Court, and when the terminology used while passing directions in case of Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay (supra) is perused, it becomes clear that the Hon'ble Apex Court clearly refers to 'former MPs/MLAs' without' carving out any specific differentiation among 'former MPs/MLAs'. Consequently, this Court lacks the jurisdiction to interpret the decision in a manner that deviates from the clear directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court. In other words, this Court cannot read something, in between the lines, which is neither the intent nor the content, finding or even obiter of the Hon'ble Apex Court.”

¶25

Thus, the Special Court can try offences pending against the sitting or

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/07/2025 at 09:41:39

¶28

former MPs/MLAs and there is no bar for trial of such person who had ceased to be an MP/MLA, when he had allegedly committed the offence. Since it is an admitted position that one of the respondents herein is a former legislator, his case therefore needs to be tried by the Special Court, set up for dealing with cases against MPs/MLAs, whether sitting or former.

¶29

Transfer Petition is therefore allowed with direction that Criminal Case bearing SC No. 408/2017, FIR No. 205/2016, PS Crime Branch South East, titled “State Vs. Raj Kumar Goel & Ors.” be withdrawn from the court of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi and be placed before the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Rouse Avenue Court with direction to allocate the same to the concerned Special Court dealing with cases relating to MPs/MLAs. Parties to appear before the court of learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Rouse Avenue Court on 14.07.2025.

¶30

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J

¶31

JULY 2, 2025/ib/sk

¶32

This is a digitally signed order.

¶33

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/07/2025 at 09:41:39

State v. Raj Kumar Goel and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State v. Raj Kumar Goel and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Healncure Product Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rishav Gautam Vs State & Anr.

Ramesh Chander Goyal & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Enforcement Directorate Vs Ram Kishore Arora and Ors.

Sarvesh Chowdhry Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Others

Directorate of Enfocement Vs Lalita Mishra

Directorate of Enforcement Vs Tej Bahadur Mishra

Kamlesh Vs Priyanka Verma and Others

Dilshad Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Mohd. Umar @ Umar Malik & Ors. Vs State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi & Anr.

Ashish Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Soni & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Mohd Shahid Vs the State of Govt & Anr.

Zaid Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.