Transfer petition under Section 447 BNSS sought to move a domestic violence case from Dwarka to Karkardooma on grounds of the petitioner's age and spinal ailments. The court held her health concerns were not exceptional and dismissed the petition along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Sharma, Advocate.
versus
PRIYANKA VERMA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: W/SI Neelu, PS: Dwarka North. Mr. Rana S. Biswas and Mr. Kartik Chettiar, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 23.07.2025
1 “BNSS”
2 “Cr.P.C”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2025 at 12:10:11
woman and has been regularly appearing for multiple cases in Karkardooma Courts, and therefore, she would not have a problem if the present case is also transferred from Dwarka to Karkardooma Courts. It is also urged that the Petitioner’s husband is an illiterate person who is unemployed and is also suffering from various age-related ailments.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 23, 2025 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2025 at 12:10:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a domestic violence case should be transferred from Dwarka Courts to Karkardooma Courts on grounds of the petitioner's age and health.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kamlesh
Priyanka Verma
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a criminal case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
