Disposed¶26

Gunjan v. Kapil Arya

Delhi HC19 May 2025TR.P.(CRL.)/41/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer petition; Delhi High Court; Justice Sanjeev Narula; decided 19.05.2025; TR.P.(CRL.) 41/2025; Gunjan v. Kapil Arya; Section 447 BNSS 2023; corresponding Section 407 CrPC 1973; Section 202 CrPC enquiry report; Complaint Case No. 7797/2018; JMFC Patiala House Courts; Saket District Courts; P.S. Tughlak Road; P.S. Lodhi Colony; office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi Road; territorial jurisdiction; cognizance not taken; proposed accused; transfer allowed; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of Complaint Case No. 7797/2018 from the Court of JMFC, Patiala House Court, New Delhi to the court of competent jurisdiction in South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi; copy of the order to be sent to the concerned Principal District and Sessions Judges. ¶26

Gunjan Vs Kapil Arya — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶26

Issue for consideration

Whether the ongoing proceedings in Complaint Case No. 7797/2018 should be transferred from the Courts at Patiala House District Courts to Saket District Courts, given that the situs of the alleged offence and the parties' addresses fall outside the jurisdiction of P.S. Tughlak Road.

¶22

Court's answer

The competent police station having jurisdiction to conduct the necessary enquiry under Section 202 CrPC is P.S. Lodhi Colony, which comes under the ambit of the Saket District Courts.

¶23

Ratio / Principle

Complaint Case No. 7797/2018, presently pending before the Court of JMFC, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, was directed to be transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction in South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.

¶24

Key takeaways

Since the Trial Court has not taken cognizance as yet, the Court found no reason to call for a response from the Respondent, who are presently only proposed accused.obiter¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

TR.P.(CRL.) 41/2025 / CRL.M.A. 15541/2025 — High Court of Delhi (Sanjeev Narula, J.), order dated 19.05.2025: Petition under Section 447 BNSS 2023 (corresponding to Section 407 CrPC 1973) by Gunjan sought transfer of Complaint Case No. 7797/2018 from JMFC, Patiala House Courts to Saket Courts. The Trial Court had requisitioned a Section 202 CrPC enquiry report; the State reported that the parties' addresses and the alleged offence situs (office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi Road) lay outside P.S. Tughlak Road, and that the situs fell within P.S. Lodhi Colony, South District (Saket Court Complex). As cognizance had not yet been taken and respondent Kapil Arya was only a proposed accused, no response was called. Holding the competent enquiry jurisdiction to lie with P.S. Lodhi Colony under the Saket District Courts, the Court allowed the petition and directed transfer of the complaint case to the court of competent jurisdiction in South District, Saket Courts; the petition was disposed of.

¶1

$~79

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- TR.P.(CRL.) 41/2025, CRL.M.A. 15541/2025

¶4

GUNJAN .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ranbir Sharma and Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

KAPIL ARYA .....Respondent Through: None.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R % 19.05.2025

¶10

The present petition under Section 447 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023¹ (corresponding to Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973² ) seeks transfer of Complaint Case No. 7797/2018 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class³ , Patiala House Court, New Delhi to the concerned JMFC, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.

¶11

During the course of proceedings in the aforesaid case, the Trial Court, requisitioned an enquiry report under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. from the State regarding contentions raised by the Petitioner. In this regard, report furnished by the State stipulates:

¶12

“Sir, Most respectfully it is submitted that this Hon'ble court passed an order dated 11.03.2024 and found that an enquiry U/s 202 CrPC is deemed appropriate on some points mentioned in the order dated

¶13

1 “BNSS”

¶14

2 “Cr.P.C.”

¶15

3 “JMFC”

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:02:36

¶18

11.03.2024. In this regard it is submitted that the complainant has alleged that Kapil Arya took Rs. 2.5 Lacs on 05.10.2015 from the complainant on pretext to get a job to the complainant as a teacher. As per the complainant the amount was paid by the complainant at the office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi Road under the jurisdiction of PS Tughlak Road, Distt. New Delhi. Thereafter an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- was given by the complainant to the alleged on 16.12.2015 and Rs. 3,00,000 on 03.02.2016. Thereafter when the alleged could not make his promise he agreed to give her money back. On 05.03.2017 a cheque of Rs. 4,50,000 bearing no 515834, dated 30.07.2017 was issued in the name of the mother of the complainant. Another cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 bearing no 515836, dated 30.07.2017 was issued in the name of the complainant and also promised to pay the rest of the amount in cash. Both the cheques returned unpaid when complainant tried to encash the same.

¶19

In this regard an enquiry into the matter was conducted and as per the enquiry conducted so far the address of the complainant as well as the alleged does not fall under the jurisdiction of PS Tughlak Road, New Delhi. The complainant has stated in his complaint that the initial amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- was given to the alleged at the office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi colony, New Delhi. In this regard it is further submitted that neither office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi, Road falls under the jurisdiction of PS Tughlak Road, New Delhi. As per the record of PS Tughlak Road and date mention by the complainant, no complaint has been received at PS Tughlak Road, New Delhi in the name of complainant Gunjan against Kapil Arya. The address of the alleged was also visited but he was not found present. As per the order of the Hon'ble court enquiry on the points mentioned in the order much enquiry could not be conducted as the same does not fall under the jurisdiction of PS Tughlak Road, Distt. New Delhi. It is further submitted that office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi Road falls under the jurisdiction of PS Lodhi Colony, South District (Saket Court Complex). However, if the Hon'ble court desires to conduct the enquiry by Police official of PS Tughlak Road, New Delhi Distt. Then some time may please be given to conduct the enquiry. The undersigned is abode by all the directions passed by the Hon'ble Court.”

¶20

As is evident from the above, the officials from P.S. Tughlak Road have indicated that they do not have the jurisdiction to conduct the enquiry as directed by the Court, since the situs of the offence, as alleged in the compliant, is an office compound of Safdarjung Airport near Lodhi Road which falls within the jurisdiction of P.S. Rohini, South District (Saket).

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:02:36

¶22

In light of the foregoing, the Petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking transfer of the ongoing proceedings from the Courts in Patiala House District Courts to Saket District Courts.

¶23

The Court has considered the submissions advanced by the counsel for Petitioner. Since the Trial Court has not taken cognizance as yet, this Court finds no reason to call for a response from the Respondent, as they are presently only proposed accused. Furthermore, in light of the report furnished by P.S. Tughlak Road, it is clear that the competent police station which has jurisdiction to conduct the necessary enquiry under Section 202 of Cr,P.C. is P.S. Lodhi Colony, which comes under the ambit of the Saket District Courts.

¶24

In view of the foregoing, the request made in the present application is allowed and it is directed that the Complaint Case No. 7797/2018 which is presently pending before the Court of JMFC, Patiala House Court, New Delhi be transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction in South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.

¶25

Copy of the order be sent to the concerned Principal District and Sessions Judges for necessary information and compliance.

¶26

With the above directions, the present petition is disposed of.

¶27

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶28

MAY 19, 2025 nk

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:02:36

Gunjan v. Kapil Arya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gunjan v. Kapil Arya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vipul Gandhi Vs Jyotsana Bhatia

Dhananjay Prsad Mishra Vs Nexgen Energia Ltd. and Ors.

Ratan Lal Gupta Vs Brahm Sharma and Anr.

Kapil Modi Vs State and Ors.

Enforcement Directorate Vs Ram Kishore Arora and Ors.

M/S Healncure Product Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rishav Gautam Vs State & Anr.

Ramesh Chander Goyal & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Md. Kazim Khan (Senior Citizen) Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Surg Lt Cdr Vijay Ganesh B Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Sonu & Ors. Vs State (Govt of N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr.

State Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs Sarvind Yadav

Jitender Dixit @ Bantu Vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Harinder Bashishta Vs State NCT of Delhi