Petitioner sought extension of Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration Act due to pending application for additional documents. Court held filing such documents was not malicious delay and granted six-month extension.
Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by six months; period since 28.03.2025 regularised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
versus DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Samarjeet Deo, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 04.09.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:28:56
application for filing additional documents on record by the petitioner is misconceived and that the said documents were within the knowledge and possession of the petitioner and the same should have been filed before.
JASMEET SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2025/AS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:28:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner had shown sufficient cause for delay in completing arbitral proceedings to justify an extension of the tribunal's mandate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Gupta Traders
Delhi Transco Limited
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
