Arbitration mandate expiring on 13.09.2025 with award reserved; petitioner sought six-month extension under Section 29A(4) and (5). Respondent raised no objection. With parties' consent, the court extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months from 14.09.2025 and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Shivank Diddi and Mr. Anuj Shrotriya, Advcoates.
versus
ENN ENN CORP LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ruchika Darira, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 08.09.2025
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 743/2025
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:36:39
enable the Arbitrator to pass the award.
JYOTI SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 Ch
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 743/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:36:39
1 issue framed by the court
Should the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A be extended to enable pronouncement of a reserved award?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Samsung India Electronics Private Limited
Enn Enn Corp Limited
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
