M/S Sarvottam Industrial Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Ansal Hi Tech Townships Limited
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(6) – appointment of sole arbitrator
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court, ARB.P. 642/2025 & I.A. 9873/2025, decided 03.09.2025 by Jasmeet Singh, J. Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 petition by M/s Sarvottam Industrial Real Estate Pvt Ltd against M/s Ansal Hi Tech Townships Limited. Disputes under two Share Purchase Agreements dated 27.05.2023 with identical arbitration clauses (Clause 16.2 SPA-1; Clause 14.2 SPA-2); respondent appointed co-developer; alleged unilateral termination of Power of Attorney; arbitration invoked by Legal Notice dated 25.12.2024; respondent served but did not appear. Valid arbitration clause upheld; Justice Rajiv Shakdher (Retd., former Chief Justice, Himachal Pradesh High Court) appointed Sole Arbitrator; DIAC-administered arbitration; DIAC Fees Rules 2018; Section 12 declaration; rights and contentions including arbitrability left open; liberty under Section 17; petition allowed.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher (Retd.) as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes; arbitration to be conducted under the aegis and rules of DIAC with remuneration per the DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018; declaration under Section 12 before entering reference; all rights and contentions left open; petitioner to approach the arbitrator within two weeks; liberty to file a Section 17 application.