Petition under Section 29A(4) and (5) for extension of the arbitrator's mandate in lease-related arbitral proceedings at the stage of final arguments. The court extended the mandate by three months and regularised the period from 11.04.2025 to 10.07.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
MR. MANISH GOYAL .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Sandhya Chawla and Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocates.
versus
MR. NARESH KUMAR JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Nirwan, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 11.07.2025
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 408/2025
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2025 at 12:42:42
months from today since the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of final arguments and period between 11.04.2025 to 10.07.2025 is regularized.
JYOTI SINGH, J
JULY 11, 2025/YA
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 408/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2025 at 12:42:42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the arbitrator's mandate, expired on 10.04.2025, should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Manish Goyal
Mr. Naresh Kumar Jain
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
