Disposed

M/S S. S.Total Construction India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Delhi HC14 May 2025O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/383/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitions under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act sought extension of the arbitral mandate, arguments having concluded with the award pending publication. The court found sufficient cause shown and extended the mandate for six months, regularising the period from 17.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by six months; period from 17.04.2025 till date regularised.

M/S S. S.Total Construction India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~86-87

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 383/2025 M/S S. S.TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INDIA PVT. LTD

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurav Singh Yadav, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Revathy Raghavan, Adv.

¶5

¶6

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 384/2025 M/S S.S. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION INDIA PVT. LTD

¶7

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurav Singh Yadav, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Revathy Raghavan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 14.05.2025

¶8

I.A. 12131/2025 & I.A. 12139/2025-EX.

¶9

Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

The applications stand disposed of.

¶11

O.M.P. (MISC.) (COMM.) 383/2025 & O.M.P. (MISC.) (COMM.) 384/2025

¶12

These are petitions filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 6 months from 17.04.2025 to 17.10.2025.

¶13

It is stated that the arguments have been concluded in the arbitral proceedings and only the arbitral award needs to be made and published.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:29:39

¶15

For the said reason, issue notice.

¶16

Mr. Raghavan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has no objection to the petitions being allowed.

¶17

I am satisfied that a sufficient cause has been shown.

¶18

Hence, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended upto 6 months from today to conclude the arbitration proceedings.

¶19

The period from 17.04.2025 till today stands regularized.

¶20

The petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶21

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶22

MAY 14, 2025 / (MS)

¶23

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶24

M/S S. S.Total Construction India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S S. S.Total Construction India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Segrow Bio Technics India Private Limited Vs M/S Affordable Infrastructure and Housing Projects Private Limited

Era Infra Engineering Ltd. Vs Executive Engineer Public Works Department

M/S Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. Vs Energy Efficiency Services Ltd. & Anr.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs M/S Crayons Advertising Limited

Siddhant Shangle Vs Government of NCT of Delhi Public Works Department

Tradex India Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs St. Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/S Refop India Company Vs M/S. Ivy Stores & Ors.

Groson Engineers Vs M/S Rajiv Aggarwal

Sh. Ashish Singh Vs Pushpa Singh

Naresh Kumar & Anr. Vs Sushil Kumar

Megalogix Vs St Martins Diocesan School

M/S Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Vs M/S Parsvnath Developers Ltd.

M/S Sargakshetra Charitable Trust Vs M/S Innovative Project Management Services Private Limited