This order permits a withdrawn appeal while explicitly stating that the Court has not examined the merits of the challenged order to prevent it from being treated as a decision on merits.
The appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
DR. RUPALI MISHRA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Dr. Amit Mishra, Adv.
DR. MANNAN GUPTA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. H.S. Parihar, Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Ms. Ikshita Parihar and Ms. Ikshita Parihar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, learned Counsel for the appellants’ seeks leave to withdraw this appeal and submits that he would move the learned Single Judge seeking vacation/modification of the order before the learned Single Judge.
2. Accordingly, we permit the appeal to be withdrawn. We make it absolutely clear that we have not examined the merits of the matter and that this order should not be treated as an order of expression of merits on the order under challenge before us.
3. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
OCTOBER 9, 2025/ AR
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Da te:1 3.10.2025 16:49:55
DR. RUPALI MISHRA & ORS.
DR. MANNAN GUPTA & ORS.
C. HARI SHANKAR
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
