Disposed

Honor Device Co. Ltd. v. Largan Precision Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi HC8 Oct 2025FAO(OS) (COMM)/158/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal disposed of by consent with directions to the appellant to file a reply to IA 18846/2025 within two weeks and for the Single Judge to finally decide that application without adjournments. Respondents undertook not to enforce orders under challenge pending decision.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of with directions on filing reply and expedited hearing; interim non-enforcement undertaking recorded.

Honor Device Co. Ltd. Vs Largan Precision Co. Ltd. & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~47

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) (COMM) 158/2025, CAV 383/2025, CM APPLs. 62813/2025, 62814/2025, 62815/2025 & 62816/2025

¶4

HONOR DEVICE CO LTD .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. Vineet Rohilla, Mr. Ankush Verma, Ms. Gurneet Kaur, Mr. Tanveer Malhotra, Mr. Sumer Dev Seth and Mr. Yashwant S. Baghel, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

LARGAN PRECISION CO LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Mr. George Vithayathil, Mr. P.S. Manjunathan, Ms. Nandini Choudhary and Ms. Mrinalini Goyat, Advs.

¶8

Mr. Maanav Kumar and Ms. Shivanjali Bhalerao, Advs. for R-5

¶9

Mr. Ankur Sangal and Mr. Ankit Arvind, Advs. for R-6

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

08.10.2025

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

¶15

1. With the consent of parties, this appeal is disposed of with a direction to the appellant to file a reply to IA 18846/2025 positively

¶16

within a period of two weeks from today with an advance copy to the Signature Not Verified

¶17

Digitally Signed By:AJITFAO(OS) (COMM) 158/2025 KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2025 17:24:45

¶18

Page 1 of 3

¶19

learned Counsel for the respondents – plaintiffs, who may file rejoinder thereto, if any, within ten days thereof.

¶20

2. We are told that IA 18846/2025 is listed before the learned Single Judge on 13 November 2025. We request the learned Single Judge to take up the application on the said date for final disposal given the nature of the dispute between the parties.

¶21

3. Learned Counsel for the parties undertake that neither of them would seek adjournment on the said date. Learned Single Judge would decide the IA 18846/2025 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC without being influenced by any observation contained in the impugned order.

¶22

4. We make it clear that this order is not to be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits or otherwise of the present appeal or on the correctness or otherwise in the impugned order.

¶23

5. All issues of fact and law shall remain open to be canvassed before the learned Single Judge when the matter is taken up.

¶24

6. Needless to say, should either party continue to remain aggrieved, their remedies in law would remain reserve.

¶25

7. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

¶26

8. In the meanwhile, the respondents have undertaken not to enforce the orders dated 5 August 2025 and 15 September 2025 which

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally Signed By:AJITFAO(OS) (COMM) 158/2025 KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2025 17:24:45

¶29

Page 2 of 3

¶30

are under challenge.

¶31

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

¶32

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

¶33

OCTOBER 8, 2025 /aky

¶34

Signature Not Verified

¶35

Digitally Signed By:AJITFAO(OS) (COMM) 158/2025 KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2025 17:24:45

¶36

Page 3 of 3

Honor Device Co. Ltd. v. Largan Precision Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Honor Device Co. Ltd. v. Largan Precision Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India and Ors. Vs Ex Sea I Uw Anil Kumar

Midas Touch Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs Fmi Limited

Union of India and Ors. Vs Akhilesh Kumar Gupta (Ex Sgt No 740430-A)

Shasmith Technologies Private Limited Vs Max Healthcare Institute Limited

Mahender Singh Vs Union of India

Union of India & Ors. Vs Ex Sea I Gs Anand Kumar Pandey No. 210641 F