Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn as the petitioner's grievance stood assuaged; court disposed of it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
RAKESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA .....Petitioner
Through: Dr. S. S. Hooda, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
%
09.10.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Mr. Hooda submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands assuaged and that the petitioner seeks, therefore, to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
OCTOBER 9, 2025/ AR
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Da te:1 3.10.2025 16:49:55
Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava
Union of India & Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court