Dismissed
N.K. Magu v. Sudesh Kumar Sadh
Delhi HCCS(OS)/485/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Plaintiff absent on two callings; suit dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 CPC along with pending applications.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~O-27
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 485/2014, I.A. 5468/2023 and I.A. 8947-8948/2023 N.K. MAGU .....Plaintiff
¶4
Through: None
¶5
versus
¶6
SUDESH KUMAR SADH .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. V. Thomas and Mr. Rohan Nair, Advs.
¶7
CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
¶8
O R D E R % 07.05.2025
¶9
- None appears on behalf of the plaintiff, despite the matter is being called out in second round.
¶10
- Accordingly, the instant suit stands dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 of the CPC, along with pending applications.
¶11
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
¶12
MAY 7, 2025/DPA/SP
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-appearance of the plaintiff under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
N.K. Magu
- respondent
Sudesh Kumar Sadh
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court