Application under Section 151 CPC seeking the original decree dated 4 November 2025 in a civil suit. The Joint Registrar heard the applicant and allowed the application, ordering the original decree to be provided as per applicable law; the application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
MR. PURSHOTTAM LAL SEHGAL & ORS.
.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vibhor Garg, Mr. Sumit Kumar Mishra, Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Ms. Yadavi Malhotra
versus
MR ARUN SEHGAL & ORS.
.....Defendant Through: Mr. Dinkar Kalra Adv. for D- 3 to 19
CORAM: JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) SH. KISHOR KUMAR (DHJS)
O R D E R % 05.02.2026
Matter is taken up through physical hearing as well as video conferencing .
I.A. 3238/2026 (u/S. 151 CPC seeking original decree dt.4.11.2025 )
Heard. In view of the contents mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the original decree dt.4.11.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court be provided as per applicable law. I.A. stands disposed off.
At request copy of this order be given Dasti.
KISHOR KUMAR (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
FEBRUARY 5, 2026/ SM
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 12:43:58
1 issue framed by the court
Should the original decree dated 4.11.2025 be provided under Section 151 CPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Purshottam Lal Sehgal & Ors.
Mr Arun Sehgal & Ors.
Kishor Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
