Disposed
Akram v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/868/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Non-substantive order: the petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a petition afresh after collecting the information needed to address arguments.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~13
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 868/2025 & CRL.M.A. 8121/2025
¶4
AKRAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa & Ms. Swadha Gupta, Advs.
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari (Adv.) ASC (Crl.) for the State along with Mr. Arjit Sharma & Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advs. SI Rekha Chauhan, PS Pandav Nagar.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 17.04.2025
¶8
- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has to seek certain more information before she can address arguments.
¶9
- The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a petition afresh after all the information is collected.
¶10
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
¶11
APRIL 17, 2025 “SK”
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Akram
- respondent
State of NCT of Delhi
Coram
AI extract
Amit Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court