Allowed

Shah Alam v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC16 Apr 2025CRL.M.C./2538/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed a cross-appeal challenging the rejection of an application for exemption from personal appearance and cancellation of Non-Bailable Warrants. Despite finding no infirmity in the lower court's order due to lack of supporting documents for the petitioner's apology, the High Court granted an exemption in the interest of justice, setting aside the warrants and directing the

What did the court decide?

Non-Bailable Warrants set aside; petitioner directed to appear before the Trial Court on 21.04.2025.

Shah Alam Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~52

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2538/2025

¶4

SHAH ALAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Muhammad Arif & Mr. Zafruddin Zafar, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State SI Navdeep, PSGovindpuri Mr. Madhav Khurana, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shashank Khurana, Ms. Sanjivani Patljoshi & Ms. K. Bansal, Advs.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

% 16.04.2025

¶8

CRL.M.A. 11377/2025 (for exemption)

¶9

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

The application stands disposed of.

¶11

CRL.M.C. 2538/2025 & CRL.M.A. 11378/2025 (for interim stay from arrest)

¶12

The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 27.03.2025 passed by the learned Trial Court rejecting the petitioner’s application seeking cancellation of Non-Bailable Warrants (‘ NBWs ’) and exemption from personal appearance.

¶13

The learned Trial Court noted that NBWs issued against the petitioner was received back with the report that he is not residing at the given address.

¶14

The petitioner also did not appear before the learned Trial Court on 27.03.2025, which was the returnable date.

¶15

The petitioner, though contended that he could not appear

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 09:40:42

¶17

on the said date since his wife had fallen sick and he had to leave for his home town, the documents in support of his contention were not produced before the learned Trial Court.

¶18

I, therefore, find no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Trial Court.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no intention to not appear and for the said reason, his Advocate had filed an application seeking exemption from personal appearance.

¶20

He submits that the petitioner, at this moment, is in his native village in Bihar. He submits that he will appear before the learned Trial Court on 21.04.2025 since some time would be taken for him to travel. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner will not seek unwarranted adjournments and will appear in person on every date.

¶21

Considering the submissions and in the interest of justice, this Court is of the opinion that one last opportunity be granted to the petitioner to appear before the learned Trial Court. 11. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the NBWs issued against the petitioner in SC No. 5216/24 are set aside.

¶22

The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 21.04.2025 at 10:00 AM.

¶23

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶24

APRIL 16, 2025 “SS”

¶25

Shah Alam v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shah Alam v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. Vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

Sidhharth Mukesh Bhandari Vs State NCT of Delhi through SHO Police Station Lodi Colony

Ashok Ranga Vs State of Delhi and Anr.

Sh Sanjay Aggarwal & Anr. Vs State Govt. NCT of Delhi and Anr.

State Vs Rajiv Kumar

Income Tax Officer Ward 73(2) New Delhi Vs Mky Constructions Private Limited and Anr. Formerly Kmown as Action Bridge Gap Constructions Pvt. L