Raj Kumar Prajapati & Anr. Vs State Gnct of Delhi through SHO & Ors.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (Crl.) for the State with Ms. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Ms. Sanskriti Nimbekar and Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Advocates. Insp. Suman Kumar, ASI Virender, P.S. DBG Road.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

% 06.03.2025

¶14

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶15

CRL.M.A. 7081/2025 (Exemption)

¶16

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

¶17

W.P.(CRL) 763/2025

¶18

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following prayers: -

¶19

“1) Pass/issue appropriate orders, directions in the nature ofa writ of Mandamus or any other writ thereby directing the Respondent no. I and Respondent no. 2 to de-freeze saving account bearing no. 10933007138 of petitioner no. I and pension account bearing no. 40370835621 of petitioner no.2 maintained with respondent no.2 at its branch office situated at Sector-1,Block -7, R.K. Puram, New

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:12:53

¶21

Delhi-110022 or in alternative subject to lien ofRs.6 lacs (disputed transfer) in the said bank accounts of the petitioner in proportionate to the transfer it be directed to respondents no. I and 2 to allow petitioners to use and operate their respective bank accounts for debit and credit transactions into the said bank accounts;

¶22

Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ thereby directing the respondent no. 2 to provide the suitable compensation to the petitioner for the harassment caused to the petitioners due freezing of their bank accounts without notice and any justifiable cause since 12.12.2024.

¶23

Cost of the petition throughout be passed in favour of petitioners. 4) Pass such other or further order(s) which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case and in the interest of justice and equity may also be passed in favour of the petitioners and against the respondents.”

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accounts of the petitioners have been defreezed, and in view of the same, he seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

¶25

Leave granted.

¶26

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶27

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶28

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶29

MARCH 6, 2025/bsr

¶30

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶31

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:12:53

Raj Kumar Prajapati & Anr. v. State Gnct of Delhi through SHO & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Prajapati & Anr. v. State Gnct of Delhi through SHO & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Rizwan Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rakesh Vs State of NCT of Delh

Vidhy a Bhushan@ Shashi Bhushan @ Guddu Vs State Ofnct of Delhi

Najmus Saqib Vs the State & Ors.

Ramanjeet Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Raushan Khatoon & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Harpal Singh Vs St Ate of NCT of Delhi

K W/O P Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Vikas Jain Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

X Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Veerender Kumar Chanana Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Suraj Thakur Vs State of NCT of Delhi

R K Arora and Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Suraj Shat Vs the State NCT of Delhi