Disposed

Mohammad Rizwan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC5 Mar 2025W.P.(CRL)/756/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner complained of drug sales near a school camp and sought mandamus directing an independent investigation. The State undertook to act on the complaint now received. The court disposed of the petition, directing the SHO to examine the complaint and take appropriate action.

What did the court decide?

SHO PS R.K. Puram directed to examine petition and complaint dated 18.02.2025 and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

Mohammad Rizwan Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~61

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 756/2025, CRL.M.A. 7017/2025

¶4

MOHAMMAD RIZWAN .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Aakriti Sharma and Ms. Kirti Yadav, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate for State with Mr. Parmod Kumar, SI, PS-Crime Branch, NDR.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 05.03.2025 1. The Petitioner alleges that one Mrs. Jaswanti and her son, who are residents of 88, Sonia Gandhi Camp, Sector 7, RK Puram, South Delhi110022, are actively engaged in selling drugs to school children. To this effect, the Petitioner has filed complaints to the local police station and the concerned authority, however, no action has been taken to curb the illegal activity. Specifically, the Petitioner alleges that the local police station SHO, R.K. Puram, has also failed to take any action on these complaints. Accordingly, the instant petition has been filed, seeking the following prayer:

¶11

“a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents to decide representation dated 18.02.2025 and immediately conduct an independent and impartial investigation into the drug trafficking activities of Respondent no 6 & 7.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:38:09

¶13

b. Pass any other order. or direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶14

Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State, submits that the complaint dated 18^th February, 2025 has not been received by the local Police station R.K. Puram. Nonetheless, she states that since the copy has now been received along with the petition, an appropriate action in accordance with law, shall be taken on the said complaint.

¶15

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶16

a. The instant petition as well as the complaint dated 18^th February, 2025 shall be examined by the SHO, PS, R.K. Puram and appropriate action be taken in accordance with law.

¶17

b. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

¶18

The present petition is disposed of, along with pending application.

¶19

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶20

MARCH 5, 2025 nk

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:38:09

Mohammad Rizwan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Rizwan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Kumkum Chaudhary & Anr. Vs the State Gnctd & Ors.

Rekha Rani and Anr. Vs the Stated of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Nishant & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Yogesh Sharma @ Rahul Sharma Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sajeeburahman C P Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. & Ors.

Sanjeev Bhardwaj & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Raj Kumar Prajapati & Anr. Vs State Gnct of Delhi through SHO & Ors.

Kunal Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Gautam Bhalla Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rekha Rani and Anr. Vs the Stated of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Safwat Amin Vs Shaihsta & Anr.

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Neeraj Verma & Ors. Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Dehi and Anr.