Writ petition sought quashing of FIR No. 533/2018 under Sections 308/34 IPC arising from a parking dispute causing simple injuries. The injured respondents settled the matter by deed dated 01.11.2020 and endorsed the settlement before the Court. Considering the compounding and simple nature of injuries, the High Court quashed the FIR and proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
NAJMUS SAQIB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Asif, Advocate along with Petitioner in person.
versus
THE STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl) with Mr. Mathew M.Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates for State with SI Anil Kumar, P.S.Jamia Nagar. Mr. Shakeel Ahmad, Advocates for R-2 & 3 along with R-2 & 3 present in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 05.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:41:50
Settlement Deed dated 01.11.2020.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 5, 2025 rk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:41:50
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 533/2018 under Sections 308/34 IPC be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Najmus Saqib
The State
Bilal Shams
Respondent No. 3
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
