This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
KUMKUM CHAUDHARY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankush Sharma, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE GNCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC (Crl) for State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Ms. Jyotsana Pandit and Mr. Mohit Raj Nagar, Advocates for State with SI Roopa, P.S.G.T.B.Enclave. Respondent No.3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 04.03.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 4, 2025 rk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:41:50
KUMKUM CHAUDHARY & ANR.
THE STATE GNCTD
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
