Habeas corpus petition by husband for production of his wife. The wife appeared in court, stated she wished to live with her parents and had filed a divorce petition at Ghaziabad. She objected to referral to mediation. The court found nothing further to adjudicate and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
Through: Mr. Archit Arora, Advocate alongwith petitioner.
versus
STATE & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State with Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Abhinav Arya, Advocates along with Insp. Sandeep Kumar
Mr. J. S. Kohli, Ms. Nisuta, Mr. Raj Vardhan Upadhyay and Mr. Paras Khanna, Advocate for R-2 to R-4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 18.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/03/2025 at 14:09:28
prayed that the instant matter be sent to the Mediation Centre for an amicable settlement between the parties.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
MARCH 18, 2025 vr/rk/mk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/03/2025 at 14:09:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of habeas corpus should issue for production of the petitioner's wife, who states she wishes to live with her parents and pursue divorce.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ankit Kumar
State
Yogita
Chandra Dhari Singh
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
