The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The instant writ petition along with pending applications was disposed of as withdrawn on March 11, 2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
MRITYUNJAY KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shrey Kumar, Advocate
versus
SAIL EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Sunil, Advocate for UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
%
O R D E R 11.03.2025
After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition.
Leave is granted.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of, as withdrawn.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
MARCH 11, 2025 Rt/anr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:42:02
Mrityunjay Kumar
SAIL Employees Cooperative Credit Society Limited
Chandra Dhar Singh
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
