Disposed

Aparna Puri v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC17 Mar 2025W.P.(CRL)/721/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by an inmate seeking directions to jail authorities on production warrants and release after bail. The State's status report stated all actions would follow law and DPR rules; prayers were satisfied and the petition was disposed of as nothing survived.

What did the court decide?

None granted; petition disposed of as prayers satisfied by the State's status report.

Aparna Puri Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 721/2025, CRL.M.A. 6664/2025-For direction to resp to file status report and release the petitioner in the interim

¶4

APARNA PURI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Gosain, Mr. Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Mr. Malak M. Bhatt, Mr. Vishvendra Tomar and Ms. Shreya Shree Singh, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶9

O R D E R % 17.03.2025

¶10

The petitioner vide the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeks the following reliefs:-

¶11

“a. Pass a Writ, order or direction in the nature of a Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the jail superintendent to inform the status of other ongoing cases & production warrants, received by the jail with respect to all matters pertaining to the Petitioner; and/or

¶12

b. Pass a Writ, order or direction in the nature of a Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the jail authorities to not withhold the release of the Petitioner on the basis of those production warrants where the date of appearance has already lapsed/expired and this Hon’ble Court may further direct the jail authorities to not consider the case as ‘pending’ where the production warrant for a specific date has already exhausted and there is no fresh

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2025 at 12:23:06

¶15

production warrants from the court concerned in terms of section 304 (c) of BNSS (earlier Section 269 (c) of the CrPC); and/or

¶16

c. Pass any other/further order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

¶17

Notice was issued on 03.03.2025 and when the matter was listed on 10.03.2025 thereafter, the learned ASC (wrongly noted as APP) appearing for the State sought time to bring the Status Report on record. Today, the Status Report is on record.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner, relying upon the order dated 19.05.2020 passed in W.P. (Crl.) 822/2020 “ Anil Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. ”, submits that the steps taken by the Jail Superintendent have to be in accordance with Section 304(C) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) [Section 269(C) of the Cr.P.C.].

¶19

Learned ASC appearing for the State, relying upon the contents of the Status Report submits that all actions by the Jail Superintendent, CJ06, Tihar Jail, New Delhi shall be taken in accordance with law. In fact, the relevant substratum of the Status Report is reproduced as under:-

¶20

“4. That the petitioner has been acknowledged about outstation cases and as per DPR-2018 Rule 1370. "The permission of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi shall be obtained after receiving of the production warrant from other state, if in case the permission is declined or not received, the intimation, the intimation for nonproduction shall be sent to the concerned court of the other state".

¶21

5. That the permission from concerned court & Hon'ble chief judicial permission has been obtained, to be produce UTP through VC. (Copy of the same is enclosed as Annexure "A.") all efforts are made to connect the hearing through VC but unable to connect, due to poor connectivity.

¶22

6. That the Petitioner has got bail via order dated 25.02.2025 in case FIR No.-ECIR/GNZO/07/2022, U/S-3 PMLA ACT, P/S-CBI in Delhi

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2025 at 12:23:06

¶25

Court and shall be transfer to the outstation state court after getting Release Warrant in Delhi case as per DPR 2018. As per jail records release warrant in Delhi case not received in jail till date.

¶26

7. That As per DPR rule 1371 "In case the next date of production is not available & no other case is pending against him in Delhi or of other states, Undertrial Prisoner shall not be released automatically in the absence of judicial remand. All efforts should be made to procure the next date of production or the inmate be made to appear before the concerned court for extension of judicial remand or for disposal of his case.””

¶27

As such, in view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned ASC appearing for the State, since the prayers sought by the petitioner herein are satisfied, there is nothing surviving in the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition alongwith pending application is disposed of.

¶28

Needless to say, the petitioner is free to approach this Court in accordance with law.

¶29

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶30

MARCH 17, 2025/akr

¶31

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2025 at 12:23:06

Aparna Puri v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aparna Puri v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Okonkiwoh Monday Tony Vs Narcotics Control Bureau and Another

Raj Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Prateek Sachdeva Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Ashish Rana and Another Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

M/S Ace Integrated Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs CBI & Anr.

Ravin and Ors. Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ankit Kumar Vs State & Ors.

Mrs. Bhawna Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sumit Mishra & Ors. Vs State/Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. & Ors.

Sachin Kaushik Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sanjay Choudhary & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Anuj Ahuja Vs Rajesh Mittal

Anuj Ahuja Vs Sumitra Mittal