Petitioners sought withdrawal of their criminal writ petitions after a closure report was filed, noting a protest petition had been filed before the Trial Court. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn without prejudice to the protest petitions pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42 to 47
| RAJ KUMAR | .....Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Through: Versus |
Advocate (appearance not given) | |
| STATE NCT OF D | ELHI & ANR. | .....Respondents |
| Through: | Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs. | |
| Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou | ||
| and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates |
| + W.P.(CRL) 1472/2 |
021 with CRL.M | .A. 12317/2021 |
|---|---|---|
| GS MIGLANI | .....Petitioner | |
| Through: Versus |
Advocate (appearance not given) | |
| STATE NCT OF | DELHI & ANR. | .....Respondents |
| Through: | Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs. | |
| Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates. |
||
| Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with | ||
| R-2 in person. |
| + W.P.(CRL) 1473/2 |
021 with CRL. | M.A. 12319/2021 |
|---|---|---|
| DEWAN RABIND | RANATH SO | NI .....Petitioner |
| Through: Versus |
Advocate (appearance not given) | |
| STATE & ANR. | .....Respondents | |
| Through: | Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs. | |
| Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates. |
||
| Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with | ||
| R-2 in person. |
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 11:49:06
Versus
STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs. Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates. Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.
| MANDEEP KAPUR | .....Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Through: Versus |
Advocate (appearance not given) |
| STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. | .....Respondents |
| Through: | Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs. Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates. |
| Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with | |
| R-2 in person. |
| VIKRAM KAPUR | Through: | .....Petitioner Advocate (appearance not given) |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| STATE AND ORS | Through: | .....Respondents Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs. Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates. |
| Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 12.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 11:49:06
they have been rendered infructuous.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 12, 2025/ PB
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 11:49:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions should be withdrawn as infructuous following filing of the closure report.
Raj Kumar
GS Miglani
Dewan Rabindranath Soni
B.S. Randhawa
Mandeep Kapur
Vikram Kapur
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
