Disposed¶19

State v. Sukash Chander Shekher @ Sukesh

Delhi HC17 Mar 2025W.P.(CRL)/638/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Room heater for jail inmate; Jail Visiting Judge / District Judge order; Central Jail No. 13, Mandoli; writ under Article 226 & 227 Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS; order passed without hearing Jail Superintendent; petition infructuous after compliance; direction that order not be used as precedent; trial courts/Jail Visiting Judges to follow due procedure; RMO recommendation for heaters in extreme cold.

What did the court decide?

Since the jail authorities duly complied with the order dated 14.01.2025 by providing the room heater and taking it back once the winter period was over, the petition impugning that order has become infructuous. ¶17

State Vs Sukash Chander Shekher @ Sukesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~79

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 638/2025 & CRL.M.A. 5923/2025 STAY STATE .....Petitioner

¶3

Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Arjit Sharma & Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates Mr. Sameer Yadav, Law Officer, Central Jail No. 13, Mandoli Prisons. versus

¶4

SUKASH CHANDER SHEKHER @ SUKESH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anant Malik, Ms. Nikita Bhardwaj, Ms. Isha Tripathi & Mr. Shobhan Sachdeva, Advocates

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

¶6

O R D E R % 17.03.2025

¶7

The present petition filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita [“ BNSS”] seeking quashing of order dated 14.01.2025, passed by the learned District Judge (Jail Visiting Judge) on a Letter No. SCJ-13/AS (UT)/2024/8699 dated 17.12.2024, whereby, the learned Jail Inspecting Judge issued directions to the petitioner to install a room heater in the cell of the respondent.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has been passed without calling for any report from the jail authorities, so much so, jail authorities were not heard and the order was passed at the back

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2025 at 12:23:01

¶10

of the petitioner. It is further submitted that no due procedure has been followed by the learned Inspecting Judge and passing of such order shall set a bad precedent to be followed in the other cases.

¶11

The impugned order reads as under:-

¶12

“ Heard. The applicant stated that RMO issued an order dated 03.0.1.2025 to provide, inter alia , room heater to the inmates in view of extreme cold. He stated that the jail authorities are not providing room heater to him.· In that view, Jail Superintendent, Central Jail No. 13, Mandoli, Delhi is directed to install a room heater immediately on receipt of this order in the cell of the applicant and submit a compliance report. A copy of order be sent to Jail Superintendent Central Jail No. 13, Mandoli, Delhi as well as the applicant for information and immediate compliance.”

¶13

The learned counsel for the respondent has drawn the attention of the Court to a Circular dated 03.01.2025 issued by Resident Medical Officer, Central Jail Hospital, Mandoli, by which, the RMO recommended that room heaters be provided to the inmates due to severe cold conditions. Learned counsel for the respondent, in all fairness, submits that in compliance with the order dated 14.01.2025, the jail authorities provided room heater to the respondent, and now, the same has been taken back after the winters are over. He submits that there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order, and therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶14

A perusal of the record reveals that respondent made a request on 20.12.2024 to the RMO for room heater and on such application, RMO recommended that room heater be provided to the respondent till the winter.

¶15

Admittedly, the impugned order dated 14.01.2025 does not reveal that any report was called from the Jail Superintendent before passing of such an order or even if, any notice of such a request made was given to the jail authorities. Notwithstanding the same, the fact remains that the jail authorities have duly complied with the said order and has taken back the

¶16

¶17

room heater since the winter period is over. Thus, the present petition, impugning the order dated 14.01.2025, has since become infructuous.

¶18

However, before parting, it is directed that the order dated 14.01.2025 may not be used as a precedent in future as the same was passed by the Court without hearing the Jail Superintendent. The trial courts/Jail Visiting Judges are directed to consider such requests and pass appropriate orders following due procedure.

¶19

Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

¶21

MARCH 17, 2025

¶22

RM/r

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2025 at 12:23:01

State v. Sukash Chander Shekher @ Sukesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State v. Sukash Chander Shekher @ Sukesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Okonkiwoh Monday Tony Vs Narcotics Control Bureau and Another

Raj Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Prateek Sachdeva Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Ashish Rana and Another Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

M/S Ace Integrated Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs CBI & Anr.

Ravin and Ors. Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ankit Kumar Vs State & Ors.

Mrs. Bhawna Vs State NCT of Delhi

Akash Parmar Vs LIC Housing Finance Ltd. through Its Director Shri Sanjeev Gupta & Anr.

Ms Cassata Hospitality LLP and Anr. & Anr. Vs Randip Dhingra & Ors.

Vikas Dhawan & Anr. Vs Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd.

Kaushal Gupta & Ors. Vs Anuj Gupta

Mohd Tariq Qureshi & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Gurjit Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi