Writ petitions sought quashing of FIR No.66/2018 under Sections 420/34 IPC. No one appeared for the petitioners on the date of hearing; the court dismissed both petitions in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24 & 25
.....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE STATE (NCT)OF DELHI & ANR
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ld. ASC for the State with Insp. Karmveer Singh P.S. Kakaji.
.....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ANR
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ld. ASC for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 14.01.2025
226 of the Constitution of India have been filed for quashing of FIR No.66/2018 under Section 420/34 IPC.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:58:59
Petitioner that the Resolution Professional in respect of the Company has been appointed. Though none had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner R.K. Arora, Mr. Vikas Sethi, Advocate on behalf of Supertech Ltd. had appeared on the last date of hearing.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JANUARY 14, 2025/va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:58:59
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No.66/2018 under Section 420/34 IPC be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 226?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Supertech Ltd
R K Arora
The State (NCT) of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
