Disposed

Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Jan 2025W.P.(CRL)/2463/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing petition based on settlement of a dispute over a shop arising from a Rs. 5 lakh loan secured by a GPA. Parties confirmed settlement before the Court; loan repaid and GPAs exchanged/cancelled. The Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom and bound parties to the settlement terms.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 0475/2021 PS Sagarpur and proceedings emanating therefrom quashed; parties bound by settlement terms.

Pawan Gupta & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2463/2024

¶4

PAWAN GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Ms. Jyoti Yadav, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates with Respondent in person (through VC) SI Shashi Bhushan Kaushik, PS Sagarpur.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R

¶9

% 13.01.2025

¶10

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 0475/2021 dated 09.11.2021, registered at Police Station-Sagarpur, Delhi for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) on the basis of the Settlement Deed dated 21.12.2021, which is on record of this Court.

¶11

Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are present in Court and are identified by the counsel for the Petitioner, as well as the Investigating Officer (I.O.). 3. Respondent No. 2/Complainant has joined the proceedings through video conferencing and he is stated to be a resident of Allahabad, Uttar

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 2463/2024 Page 1 of 3

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:30:08

¶14

Pradesh. He is identified by the I.O. as well as by the Counsel for the Petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the dispute between the parties was with respect to Shop No. RZ-38, Pankha Road, Raghu Nagar, Sagarpur, South West Delhi-110045.

¶16

It is stated that Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 has advanced a loan of Rs. 5 lakhs to Respondent no. 2 and in lieu thereof Respondent no. 2 had executed General Power of Attorney (‘GPA’) in favour of Petitioner No. 1; and this transaction led to disputes between the parties.

¶17

It is stated that the parties have now mutually settled their disputes.

¶18

It is stated Respondent No. 2 has returned the amount of Rs. 5 lakhs to Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and the GPA earlier executed by Respondent no. 2 in favour of Petitioner No. 1 has been cancelled.

¶19

It is stated that further Petitioner No. 1 has executed a GPA in favour of Respondent No. 2 with respect to Shop No. RZ-38, Pankha Road, Raghu Nagar, Sagarpur, South West Delhi-110045; and thus the Petitioner recognize that the ownership of the said shop vests in Respondent no. 2.

¶20

It is stated that in view of the aforesaid settlement arrived between the parties and considering the fact that parties are neighbours, owning shops opposite each other in the area of Pankha Road, Raghu Nagar, Sagarpur, Delhi parties have decided to amicably resolve the dispute.

¶21

The Petitioners who are present in Court and Respondent No. 2 who has joined the proceedings through VC confirm the settlement.

¶22

Keeping in view the nature of the dispute and the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and considering the chances of conviction of the Petitioners being remote and bleak, this Court is, therefore, of the

¶23

W.P.(CRL) 2463/2024 Page 2 of 3

¶24

¶25

view that there is no use continuing with proceedings of the present FIR, as it would be misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer. Further this Court is also of the considered opinion that it is a fit case to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶26

In view of the above, the FIR No. 0475/2021 dated 09.11.2021 registered at Police Station-Sagarpur, Delhi for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶27

Parties shall abide by the terms of settlement and remain bound by the same.

¶28

The present petition stands disposed of.

¶29

Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

¶30

The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.

¶31

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶32

JANUARY 13, 2025/ mt/MG

¶33

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶34

W.P.(CRL) 2463/2024 Page 3 of 3

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:30:08

Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Puran Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Azhar Khan Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dharmender Kumar Tandon Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Archit Ashwani Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Prestige Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Runwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Prernaa Malhotra and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Poonam Vs Prashant Kumar & Ors.

Puran Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Azhar Khan Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Rahul Parcha Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Sharad Maheshwari Vs State of NCT Delhi and Ors.

Vivek Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shamsher @ Shammi Vs State & Ors.