Disposed¶24

Yogesh Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC15 Jan 2025W.P.(CRL)/108/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(CRL) 108/2025; Yogesh Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi; furlough; parole; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ petition (criminal); Delhi High Court; Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora; Competent Authority; four weeks; WP(CRL) No. 2402/2024; order dated 06.09.2024; compliance 10.03.2025; Jail Superintendent; CRL.M.A. 958/2025 exemption; reasoned order; digitally signed order DHC.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Competent Authority to treat the petition as the Petitioner's application for furlough, hear and dispose of it within four weeks, and communicate the order forthwith; compliance listed for 10.03.2025; copy of the order sent to the Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance. ¶24

Yogesh Bansal Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~69

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 108/2025

¶4

YOGESH BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Panwar, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocates along with SI Rajesh Kumar, PS: Vijay Vihar

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R

¶9

% 15.01.2025

¶10

CRL.M.A. 958/2025 (for exemption)

¶11

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

The application stands disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(CRL) 108/2025

¶14

The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Respondent to release the Petitioner on furlough for a period of three (3) weeks.

¶15

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner is not being permitted to apply for the furlough.

¶16

4.1 He states that the Petitioner is entitled to have a reasoned order denying him the right of furlough.

¶17

He states that the Petitioner was last granted parole by the order dated

¶18

W.P.(CRL) 108/2025

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:18:28

¶21

06.09.2024 passed by this Court in WP(CRL) No. 2402/2024.

¶22

In view of the submissions recorded hereinabove, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to treat the present petition as an application of the Petitioner for the prayer of furlough.

¶23

6.1 The Competent Authority is directed that the prayer for the furlough be heard and disposed of within a period of four (4) weeks and the order be communicated with the Petitioner forthwith.

¶24

With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶25

List for reporting compliance on 10.03.2025.

¶26

Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance.

¶27

The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.

¶28

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶29

JANUARY 15, 2025/ rhc/sk

¶30

W.P.(CRL) 108/2025

¶31

Page 2 of 2

¶32

Yogesh Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prestige Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Runwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Prernaa Malhotra and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Poonam Vs Prashant Kumar & Ors.

Shri Gopal @ Mani Gopal Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Mukul & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vinay Solanki Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ms Aastha Agrawal Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Prestige Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Saroj Kumar (through Pairokar) Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Prernaa Malhotra and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ms. Sarita Upadhyay @ Sarita Alok Upadhyay & Anr. Vs Alok Upadhyay @ Alok Ashok Upadhyay

Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Pritam Vs State NCT of Delhi